Weekly Economic Update

Economic Update 3-16-2015

  • Economic reports of the week were highlighted by retail sales, which disappointed, perhaps with weather effects; consumer and business sentiment was a bit weaker upon a recent trend of higher gasoline prices; and import prices and inflation remained contained.
  • Markets were generally off around the globe. As interest rates fell during the week, bonds generally gained ground in the U.S. with mixed foreign results due to the headwind of a stronger dollar.  Commodities fell back for the same reason, led by oil, which experienced inventory supply concerns.

U.S. large cap stocks lost a bit of ground on the week, upon weaker retail sales, and related worries about a strong dollar affecting corporate profits.  Small caps outperformed large companies, giving this segment a year-to-date lead.  From a sector standpoint, healthcare and financials led with positive returns—healthcare due to robust M&A activity and financials upon a generally successful round of stress tests—while energy and technology lagged by declining several percent.  The upcoming FOMC meeting this week may also add some nervousness to markets, as investors are watching even small tweaks to language hinting at timing of interest rate change policy.

Foreign stocks lost ground on the week, with developing markets faring better than emerging.  Japan was one of the best performing regions, gaining about a percent upon recently stronger sentiment surrounding profitability of large multi-nationals, larger European nations were generally flat, and the U.K. brought down the broader EAFE index with losses over -4%—so the story was nuanced.  Emerging markets were similarly nuanced with Mexico and China faring quite well on the week, and extreme losses from BRIC nations Russia and Brazil dragging the index down dramatically.  Russian sentiment has largely been driven by oil pricing, while Brazilian equities suffered in the midst of more political drama and public demonstrations surrounding the Petrobras corruption probe.

U.S. bonds overall gained with lower interest rates, and long duration Treasuries led the way.  Credit lagged, for the most part, as spreads widened a bit.  Foreign bonds generally came in higher in local terms, with the kickoff of European QE bond-buying, but when translated back to a stronger dollar (by about 2.5% or so last week), many segments gave up those gains in U.S. investor terms.

U.S. real estate bucked the trend of other equities by gaining several percent, no doubt helped by lower interest rates.  Most sectors were generally within a tight range of the overall index, with malls and residential performing best and industrial lagging somewhat.  Overseas, most markets ended up in the red, with the exception of Japan, while U.K. and Australia fared worst.

Commodities fell back by over -5%, as measured by the S&P GSCI, as major component crude oil fell backward down to the $45/barrel range.  A strong dollar didn’t help matters, either.  Aside from lean hogs, which no index owns enough of, wheat and copper were the only positive-performing groups.  Unleaded gasoline and natural gas also corrected somewhat, albeit to a lesser extent than oil.  Much of the news was centered around growing stockpiles at the Cushing, Okla. commercial storage hub—debate continues about whether oil price weakness is due to either slowing overall global growth or stronger supply dynamics, and likely contains elements of both, with perhaps more of a tilt to the supply side as the most pressing concern in recent months.  Falling rig counts and other adjustments may have served to stem the dramatic declines, but uncertainty about where that ‘perfect’ market-clearing price continues.  Additionally, gasoline stocks are at 5-year highs, which balances the recent refinery outages somewhat—we watch gasoline particularly due to its near-term impact on consumer sentiment.

We spoke about the dollar a bit during last week’s monthly advisor meeting in the context of why foreign assets continue to be important pieces in a broadly diversified portfolio.  Like any purchased good (oil, bonds, etc.), a strong valuation of a currency can be stubbornly persistent for a time, but can ultimately sow the seeds of its own destruction.  We’ve seen a bit of this already, as a strong dollar has pressured export activity (as one would expect it would), which in turn raises concerns about revenues earned from abroad (which are, as we know, are not a small part of S&P revenues), which could ultimately pressure earnings downward (estimates have already been lowered).  If this became extreme enough, it could carry through to slower economic activity, which would depress economic growth and depress interest rates—arguably two main reasons hoisting the dollar to its current strong position.

Currency comparisons are essentially ‘pair trades,’ meaning a currency only has value in relative terms to another.  If the intense QE exercise in Europe leads to a weaker Euro (it was already weak), this will likely benefit export activity, translating to better earnings and stronger economic growth, and, eventually higher interest rates.  In so doing, the Euro would become less weak as prospects in Europe will have fundamentally improved.  It’s never this easy or clear-cut, mind you, but the self-correcting tendency of currencies is the machine that ensures conditions don’t get too far off the rails over time.  But, it does take some time.

 

Period ending 3/13/2015 1 Week (%) YTD (%)
DJIA -0.52 0.16
S&P 500 -0.80 0.19
Russell 2000 1.25 2.50
MSCI-EAFE -1.72 2.70
MSCI-EM -3.26 -1.75
BarCap U.S. Aggregate 0.54 0.69

 

U.S. Treasury Yields 3 Mo. 2 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr. 30 Yr.
12/31/2014 0.04 0.67 1.65 2.17 2.75
3/6/2015 0.01 0.73 1.70 2.24 2.83
3/13/2015 0.03 0.68 1.60 2.13 2.70

Sources:  LSA Portfolio Analytics, American Association for Individual Investors (AAII), Associated Press, Barclays Capital, Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank, FactSet, Financial Times, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Asset Management, Kiplinger’s, Marketfield Asset Management, Minyanville, Morgan Stanley, MSCI, Morningstar, Northern Trust, Oppenheimer Funds, Payden & Rygel, PIMCO, Rafferty Capital Markets, LLC, Schroder’s, Standard & Poor’s, The Conference Board, Thomson Reuters, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Federal Reserve, Wells Capital Management, Yahoo!, Zacks Investment Research.  Index performance is shown as total return, which includes dividends, with the exception of MSCI-EM, which is quoted as price return/excluding dividends.  Performance for the MSCI-EAFE and MSCI-EM indexes is quoted in U.S. Dollar investor terms.                                                          

The information above has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but no representation is made as to its completeness, accuracy or timeliness.  All information and opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.  Information provided in this report is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment, legal or tax advice; and does not constitute an offer, or a solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security, investment or other product. 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Economic News and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s